Clinton and Obama nonsense

It seems than both Clinton and Obama have not finished accepting the results of the elections of November 8^th. And they not are the only ones, because the progressive American elite can no accept the fact than the results in the polls do not always what we want, and when it is so they begin despise democracy. And is that this phenomenon seems in which the pollsters are not right has been happening all this year around of the world: the Brexit, no to the Colombian peace, the victory of Donald Trump and no the no of the Italians to suppress a parliamentary chamber, despite the fact that the poll showers the victory to the contrary. In the United States no is the exception, because Obama’s mandate has been far from exemplary.

The first signal that things were no accepted by the former first lady was the request of website change.org in which the Electoral College is asked to change its vote towards the standard-bearer of the Democratic Party to “consider that she is better qualified for the position. The second is the threat of the Californians to leave the American Union by no wanting accept the real estate tycoon as the future president. The third is the counting of votes that Mrs. Clinton asked in Wisconsin in which she shot her back because instead winning votes she lost thousands. And now, in the CIA statements, they said something that stumbles in the stupid and that can have very important political repercussions when saying that the government of Russia manipulated the elections in favor of Donald Trump ARE ACCEPTING THATH THEY HAVE STOPPED BEING WORLD-WIDE POWER AND A REPUBLIC OF THE THIRD WORLD IN WHICH FOREIGN GOVERMNMENTS. Obama is unconscious in accepting this statements, as they can provoke a diplomatic conflict of unpredictable consequence with Putin.

What is the above? Because they first praise democracy, and it is now very fashionable to subject matters of public interest to popular vote so that people vote for what is “right”. But lately it has won in the elections what is considerate politically “wrong” and this has generated unease among progressives. In the United States this has not been the exception, since Barack Obama’s government has been a disaster after another and this is the cost to his government. Obama and Clinton have not understood that this administration of the Democratic Party is faulted in every way and therefore do not accept its defeat. I am very sure that those statements of the CIA are an invention of Obama in an attempt to avoid the entrance of Donald Trump to the presidency of the Colossus of the North, so it seems that they conceal something that this moment I cannot describe. What I can tell you is that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are taking a non-democratic attitude for this defeat. Change.org and the groups that protested in major American cities claim to defend democracy, but seems that only when their designs succeed. We are trouble then because people who claim to defend democracy trample on it when they are no successful.

Of course that for some time is talk of the decline of the United States as a world power, I think this is the confirmation of those claims. The mistakes made since Bill Clinton administration to the Obama administration have had negative repercussions in both economic and social matters. Of course Trump won in part by capitalizing of the discontent of the Americans. Of course I don’t like to say things that the Latinos are not, but behind Trump’s speech there is a very painful truth that Mexicans refuse accept: no country on Earth has the obligation to give the opportunities that another has not wanted to create. This has not been accepted by many people on both sides in the border and they consider that Trump’s rhetoric is openly racist. However, no one says that Obama is the president that most illegal immigrants have launched in American history; that Bill Clinton was the first to request a review of NAFTA, he began building a wall at the border and canceled visas to force us to renew it every 10 years (before we had a visa for life) and that Obama topped that the last one by doing the process by means of two appointments (thus it is easiest to reject applicants); and much less than Ronald Reagan, Republican, was the who gave the amnesty for illegal immigrants in 1986. We also forget that NAFTA was signed by a Republican, so I realize American party we have better relations, and I fear it is not with the donkey party, buy with the elephant party. This is a subject to reflect for a while, including the third world of the United States, something unfortunate.